Total
6390 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-32613 | 2 Fedoraproject, Radare | 2 Fedora, Radare2 | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| In radare2 through 5.3.0 there is a double free vulnerability in the pyc parse via a crafted file which can lead to DoS. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32606 | 2 Fedoraproject, Linux | 2 Fedora, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel 5.11 through 5.12.2, isotp_setsockopt in net/can/isotp.c allows privilege escalation to root by leveraging a use-after-free. (This does not affect earlier versions that lack CAN ISOTP SF_BROADCAST support.) | ||||
| CVE-2021-32495 | 1 Radare | 1 Radare2 | 2024-11-21 | 10 Critical |
| Radare2 has a use-after-free vulnerability in pyc parser's get_none_object function. Attacker can read freed memory afterwards. This will allow attackers to cause denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2021-32421 | 1 Dpic Project | 1 Dpic | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| dpic 2021.01.01 has a Heap Use-After-Free in thedeletestringbox() function in dpic.y. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31804 | 1 Leocad | 1 Leocad | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| LeoCAD before 21.03 sometimes allows a use-after-free during the opening of a new document. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31516 | 1 Vector35 | 1 Binary Ninja | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Vector 35 Binary Ninja 2.3.2660 (Build ID 88f343c3). User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of BNDB files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13670. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31502 | 1 Opentext | 1 Brava\! Desktop | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop Build 16.6.4.55. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of PDF files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13673. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31497 | 1 Opentext | 1 Brava\! Desktop | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of OpenText Brava! Desktop 16.6.3.84. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of DWG files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13311. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31470 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 2 3d, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-12947. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31460 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of XFA templates. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13096. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31459 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA Forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13162. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31458 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13150. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31457 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13147. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31456 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Phantompdf, Reader, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13102. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31455 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13100. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31453 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA Forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13092. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31451 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13089. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31450 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of XFA forms. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13084. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31441 | 2 Foxitsoftware, Microsoft | 3 Foxit Reader, Phantompdf, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.1.1.37576. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current process. Was ZDI-CAN-13101. | ||||
| CVE-2021-31188 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10, Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607 and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Windows Graphics Component Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||