Total
8119 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-9633 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The LH Signing plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.83. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the plugin_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9634 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Plugin updates blocker plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the pub_save action handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to disable or enable plugin updates via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9623 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Admin in English with Switch plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the enable_eng function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify administrator language settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9628 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The The integration of the AMO.CRM plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the settings_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify critical API connection settings including the AMO.CRM API URL, login credentials, and API hash key via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9635 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Analytics Reduce Bounce Rate plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the unbounce_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify Google Analytics tracking settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9627 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Run Log plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.10. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the oirl_plugin_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings including distance units, pace display preferences, style themes, and display positions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9620 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-12 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Seo Monster plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the check_integration() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8479 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Zoho Flow plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.14.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the zoho_flow_deactivate_plugin function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify typography settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11142 | 1 Proticaret | 1 Proticaret | 2025-09-12 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Gosoft Software Proticaret E-Commerce allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Proticaret E-Commerce: before v6.0 NOTE: According to the vendor, fixing process is still ongoing for v4.05. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58975 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Helmut Wandl Advanced Settings allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Advanced Settings: from n/a through 3.1.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58997 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-11 | 9.6 Critical |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Frenify Mow allows Code Injection. This issue affects Mow: from n/a through 4.10. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58991 | 3 Cristiano Zanca, Woocommerce, Wordpress | 3 Woocommerce Booking Bundle Hours, Woocommerce, Wordpress | 2025-09-11 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cristiano Zanca WooCommerce Booking Bundle Hours allows Stored XSS. This issue affects WooCommerce Booking Bundle Hours: from n/a through 0.7.4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9622 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| The WP Blast | SEO & Performance Booster plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on multiple administrative actions in the Settings class. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger cache purging, sitemap clearing, plugin data purging, and score resetting operations via forged requests granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9888 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2025-09-11 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Maspik – Ultimate Spam Protection plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.5.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the clear_log function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to clear all spam logs via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20326 | 1 Cisco | 1 Unified Communications Manager | 2025-09-10 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Unified Communications Manager (Unified CM) Software and Cisco Unified CM Session Management Edition (SME) Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack on an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient CSRF protections for the web-based management interface on an affected device. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a malicious link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to perform arbitrary actions with the privilege level of the affected user. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55147 | 1 Ivanti | 4 Connect Secure, Neurons For Secure Access, Policy Secure and 1 more | 2025-09-10 | 8.8 High |
| CSRF in Ivanti Connect Secure before 22.7R2.9 or 22.8R2, Ivanti Policy Secure before 22.7R1.6, Ivanti ZTA Gateway before 2.8R2.3-723 and Ivanti Neurons for Secure Access before 22.8R1.4 (Fix deployed on 02-Aug-2025) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute sensitive actions on behalf of the victim user. User interaction is required | ||||
| CVE-2025-21193 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022 and 2 more | 2025-09-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| Active Directory Federation Server Spoofing Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2025-42923 | 1 Sap | 1 Fiori | 2025-09-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| Due to insufficient CSRF protection in SAP Fiori App Manage Work Center Groups, an authenticated user could be tricked by an attacker to send unintended request to the web server. This has low impact on integrity and no impact on confidentiality and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8711 | 1 Ivanti | 4 Connect Secure, Neurons For Secure Access, Policy Secure and 1 more | 2025-09-09 | 5.4 Medium |
| CSRF in Ivanti Connect Secure before 22.7R2.9 or 22.8R2, Ivanti Policy Secure before 22.7R1.6, Ivanti ZTA Gateway before 2.8R2.3-723 and Ivanti Neurons for Secure Access before 22.8R1.4 (Fix deployed on 02-Aug-2025) allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute limited actions on behalf of the victim user. User interaction is required. | ||||
| CVE-2025-50586 | 1 Daycloud | 1 Studentmanage | 2025-09-09 | 6.5 Medium |
| StudentManage v1.0 was discovered to contain Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). | ||||