Total
3426 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2022-48619 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 2 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in drivers/input/input.c in the Linux kernel before 5.17.10. An attacker can cause a denial of service (panic) because input_set_capability mishandles the situation in which an event code falls outside of a bitmap. | ||||
| CVE-2022-48571 | 1 Memcached | 1 Memcached | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| memcached 1.6.7 allows a Denial of Service via multi-packet uploads in UDP. | ||||
| CVE-2022-48564 | 3 Netapp, Python, Redhat | 4 Active Iq Unified Manager, Python, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| read_ints in plistlib.py in Python through 3.9.1 is vulnerable to a potential DoS attack via CPU and RAM exhaustion when processing malformed Apple Property List files in binary format. | ||||
| CVE-2022-48475 | 1 Cbm | 1 Control De Ciber | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Control de Ciber version 1.650, in the printing function. Sending a modified request by the attacker could cause a Buffer Overflow when the adminitrator tries to accept or delete the print query created by the request. | ||||
| CVE-2022-48474 | 1 Cbm | 1 Control De Ciber | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| Control de Ciber, in its 1.650 version, is affected by a Denial of Service condition through the version function. Sending a malicious request could cause the server to check if an unrecognized component is up to date, causing a memory failure error that shuts down the process. | ||||
| CVE-2022-48063 | 1 Gnu | 1 Binutils | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| GNU Binutils before 2.40 was discovered to contain an excessive memory consumption vulnerability via the function load_separate_debug_files at dwarf2.c. The attacker could supply a crafted ELF file and cause a DNS attack. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47696 | 1 Gnu | 1 Binutils | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| An issue was discovered Binutils objdump before 2.39.3 allows attackers to cause a denial of service or other unspecified impacts via function compare_symbols. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47695 | 1 Gnu | 1 Binutils | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| An issue was discovered Binutils objdump before 2.39.3 allows attackers to cause a denial of service or other unspecified impacts via function bfd_mach_o_get_synthetic_symtab in match-o.c. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47556 | 1 Ormazabal | 4 Ekorccp, Ekorccp Firmware, Ekorrci and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Uncontrolled resource consumption in ekorRCI, allowing an attacker with low-privileged access to the web server to send continuous legitimate web requests to a functionality that is not properly validated, in order to cause a denial of service (DoS) on the device. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47085 | 1 Ostree Project | 1 Ostree | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in ostree before 2022.7 allows attackers to cause a denial of service or other unspecified impacts via the print_panic function in repo_checkout_filter.rs. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47011 | 1 Gnu | 1 Binutils | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered function parse_stab_struct_fields in stabs.c in Binutils 2.34 thru 2.38, allows attackers to cause a denial of service due to memory leaks. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47010 | 1 Gnu | 1 Binutils | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered function pr_function_type in prdbg.c in Binutils 2.34 thru 2.38, allows attackers to cause a denial of service due to memory leaks. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47008 | 1 Gnu | 1 Binutils | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered function make_tempdir, and make_tempname in bucomm.c in Binutils 2.34 thru 2.38, allows attackers to cause a denial of service due to memory leaks. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47007 | 1 Gnu | 1 Binutils | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered function stab_demangle_v3_arg in stabs.c in Binutils 2.34 thru 2.38, allows attackers to cause a denial of service due to memory leaks. | ||||
| CVE-2022-45199 | 1 Python | 1 Pillow | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Pillow before 9.3.0 allows denial of service via SAMPLESPERPIXEL. | ||||
| CVE-2022-45044 | 1 Siemens | 68 Siprotec 5 6md85, Siprotec 5 6md85 Firmware, Siprotec 5 6md86 and 65 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SA84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions < V8.89), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.64), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (All versions < V9.50 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (All versions < V8.89 installed on CP100 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (All versions < V9.50 installed on CP150 and CP300 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (All versions installed on CP200 devices), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions < V9.50), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V9.50). Affected devices do not properly restrict secure client-initiated renegotiations within the SSL and TLS protocols. This could allow an attacker to create a denial of service condition on the ports 443/tcp and 4443/tcp for the duration of the attack. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43893 | 3 Apple, Ibm, Microsoft | 3 Macos, Security Verify Privilege On-premises, Windows | 2024-11-21 | 2.7 Low |
| IBM Security Verify Privilege On-Premises 11.5 could allow a privileged user to cause by using a malicious payload. IBM X-Force ID: 240634. | ||||
| CVE-2022-43740 | 1 Ibm | 1 Security Verify Access Oidc Provider | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Security Verify Access OIDC Provider could allow a remote user to cause a denial of service due to uncontrolled resource consumption. IBM X-Force ID: 238921. | ||||
| CVE-2022-40735 | 1 Diffie-hellman Key Exchange Project | 1 Diffie-hellman Key Exchange | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows use of long exponents that arguably make certain calculations unnecessarily expensive, because the 1996 van Oorschot and Wiener paper found that "(appropriately) short exponents" can be used when there are adequate subgroup constraints, and these short exponents can lead to less expensive calculations than for long exponents. This issue is different from CVE-2002-20001 because it is based on an observation about exponent size, rather than an observation about numbers that are not public keys. The specific situations in which calculation expense would constitute a server-side vulnerability depend on the protocol (e.g., TLS, SSH, or IKE) and the DHE implementation details. In general, there might be an availability concern because of server-side resource consumption from DHE modular-exponentiation calculations. Finally, it is possible for an attacker to exploit this vulnerability and CVE-2002-20001 together. | ||||
| CVE-2022-40513 | 1 Qualcomm | 118 Csr8811, Csr8811 Firmware, Ipq5010 and 115 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Transient DOS due to uncontrolled resource consumption in WLAN firmware when peer is freed in non qos state. | ||||